What Shall We Do Now?
by Shirley Rickett
July 31, 2016, UUFHC
Let’s talk about speech. About what we say, how we say it, when we say it, and the other half of that, listening. I’m going to attempt to weave an essay by Phillip Kennicott, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer for the Washington Post with some of the text of President Obama’s speech at the Dallas Memorial for the five fallen policemen.
The time frame for this goes back to July 12th when we had gone through a month of violence. Since that time the terrible attack in Nice has happened, an attempted coup in Turkey took place, and more troops were commissioned to Iraq. Remember Orlando? Forty-nine killed, fifty injured. In Louisiana a black man was held down by police and ultimately shot, and in Minnesota, another black man was shot with his girlfriend in the front seat of a car and four-year-old in the backseat. And now we have Nice, France and a 19-ton truck.
Kinnicott talks first about empathy in his essay. He says, “If we can’t empathize across lines of race, religion, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, then there’s no hope of preserving democratic governance. Before this day is over you will have dozens of encounters with people who disagree with you, and the vast majority of those encounters will be amiable,” and later he says, “It is difficult to persuade anyone to change his or her mind about political, ethical or religious matters; it is virtually impossible to persuade a stranger to change his or her mind about anything. You may shame someone into silence for a while, but you will not change their heart. It is possible to transform the way people think, but this takes years, or decades, and it requires love.”
So what shall we do now?
President Obama found himself in one more church, one more memorial, with the job of speaking to violence and death, to more than one audience. Like Lawrence O’Donnell, I believe that speech is something we have not heard and may never hear again, although I would go further. The structure and performance of the presentation, (half-sermon, half-speech some say) was profound. It is difficult enough to focus a speech on one audience and keep people engaged, but the President spoke to at least three audiences: the bereaved families of the policemen, the bereaved families of the most recent African Americans killed by police, and local and national audiences.
“You may shame someone into silence for a while, but you will not change their heart.” That’s Killicott. The President spoke of the heart also. Late in his speech this is what he said:
“Can we do this? Can we find the character, as Americans, to open our hearts to each other?
Can we see in each other a common humanity and a shared dignity, and recognize how our different experiences have shaped us? And it doesn’t make anybody perfectly good or perfectly bad, it just makes us human. I don’t know. I confess that sometimes I, too, experience doubt. I’ve been to too many of these things. I’ve seen too many families go through this. But then I am reminded of what the Lord tells Ezekiel. I will give you a new heart, the Lord says, and put a new spirit in you. I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh.”
“That’s what we must pray for, each of us: a new heart. Not a heart of stone, but a heart open to the fears and hopes and challenges of our fellow citizens. That’s what we’ve seen in Dallas these past few days. That’s what we must sustain.”
Empathy. What both Killicott and the President are saying we need empathy.
Empathy implies more than feeling. Miss Hester, my fifth grade teacher, once taught us the difference between sympathy and empathy. Sympathy is when you feel sad for someone else. A grandmother dies and your friend was very close to her. You see your friend sad and you feel sad for what your friend is feeling. However, empathy is different. You become involved with the loss, the suffering of another friend, or someone you never met. So you make a card, (or a protest sign) and your mother bakes cookies and you go to their house after the funeral and try to comfort your friend and the family. And you tell your friend how you felt when your beloved uncle died.
Empathy can work on another level, too, said Miss Hester. You go to a concert and sit through a piano concerto. You play the piano yourself and as the music rises from the keyboard your hands move on your lap and the music reaches a crescendo and the audience rises as one at the finish. As you go home, you realize your fingers and hands are tired. You were so lost in the music and the playing that your own hands were moving and you weren’t aware of this. Part of the enjoyment and appreciation of art involves empathy.
Showing posts with label by Shirley Rickett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label by Shirley Rickett. Show all posts
Thursday, September 22, 2016
What Shall We Do Now?
Monday, November 2, 2015
A Long, Strange Trip - Part I
This sermon was presented by Shirley Rickett on 25 October, 2015.
Imagine yourself in a
cave. It is deep in the womb of the
earth. It is so completely dark you cannot see your hand in front of you. Then
the torches arrive and you begin your charcoal sketches on the walls of the cave.
It is spirit that guides your hand, the hand of the artist. The walls offer a
shoulder to an animal, a ripple for running legs.
Some years ago, my spouse
and I watched a 3-D documentary directed by Werner Herzog: The Cave
of Forgotten Dreams. It was one of
the most mesmerizing pieces of film and art I have ever witnessed. The artists created magnificent cave art
35,000 years ago in the Chauvet cave in southern France. The people were Cro Magnum humans of the Bear
Clan. Not the amusing Disney creatures
of the Ice Age but people we have much more in common with than we may like to
think.
Artist, John Robinson,
who specializes in rock art said, “The Bear Clan couldn’t have survived without
possessing a sophisticated language, let alone have created art.” (The Art
of the Chauvet Cave: Ice Age Paleolithic
Cave Paintings, Bradshaw Foundation, “Return to the Chauvet Cave,”
online). Robinson, one of the few people
allowed in the cave to study the art in Chauvet, was astonished at the beauty
of line, the energy and detail. In the
film, archaeologists and linguists explain that humans of this time believed
that there was only one language shared with trees, grass, wind sky, water. In
other words humans were not separated from what surrounded them. Much like indigenous peoples of the world, they
were a part of it all: one language, one
spirit, one all.
A few years ago I
attended a workshop held by John Phillip Santos. His book, Places Left Unfinished at the Time of Creation, was a National Book
Award Finalist. The workshop was on the
genre Memoir, which in recent years had been booming. He spoke about how
something was happening. He didn’t believe the recent rush to Ancestry.com and the
Genome Project was accidental. He cited at least three books that discussed how
our DNA could be changed based on the newest technologies. He believed the heightened interest in
ancestry and memoir was a kind of unconscious collective movement in response
to advances in technology that is moving faster than the time needed to know
and understand what that may mean, ethically and morally. Modern science tells
us that the history of the human race lies in the DNA of each of us. If DNA is changed in us, who or what will we
be?
I begin here on the long, strange, trip to
make a point about UUism. Human beings evolved and adapted and we share the
history of ourselves, our species, in our DNA.
Just to touch that time and people through art gives me goose bumps. It
was long before Christianity of course, but the quality of art speaks to us
today, and illuminates the seventh principle, “respect for the interdependent web
of all existence of which we are all a part.”
Now imagine the time is
100 years or more before the birth of Christ.
Near Qumran, “white-robed ‘spiritual-seekers’ had walked out of major
cities of the fertile crescent to gather into small communities” in the most remote
parts of the desert. (The Essene Book
of Days, 2002, p. 7). Professor L. Michael White has said that: “It has been sometimes suggested that Jesus,
himself, or maybe John the Baptist were members of this group.” (“A Portrait of
Jesus’ World—The Essenes and the Dead Sea Scrolls,” online). This group known
as the Essenes had abandoned Jerusalem in protest over how the temple was run.
(White)
The Essenes, mentioned in
the Bible in the company of the Sadducees and Pharisees, were only a few of the
diverse, early Christian groups present around the time Jesus was born. We know more about the Essenes because of the
scrolls they hid nearly 2000 years ago in several caves on a rugged cliff on
the banks of the Dead Sea. They were first discovered around 1947. Both the Dead Sea Scrolls and the books known
as Nag Hammadi first discovered in 1945, were found by accident, and both took
years to come to the eyes of scholars due to theft, antiquities dealers, and the black market, until they finally attracted
the attention of the Egyptian, Palestinian and Israeli governments. (Pagels, p.
xv)l
Elaine Pagels is a scholar of the history of
Christianity. Her book, The Gnostic Gospels, is a fascinating
look into one of the Christian groups around the time of Jesus that allows us
to understand origins of ideas other than orthodox we know today, and to consider
diverse ways of thinking on words Jesus
said, may have said, or that were hidden from those who would destroy them. Her
thesis is to show how gnostic forms of Christianity interact with orthodoxy and
what that tells us about the origins of Christianity itself, (Pagels, p. xxxiv). She says at the end of her
introduction, “By investigating the texts from Nag Hammadi, together with
sources known for well over a thousand years from orthodox tradition, we can see how politics and religion coincide
in the development of Christianity.” (Pagels, p. xxxvi)l
Briefly, here are three religious
liberal ideas from the Gnostics:
They questioned if suffering, labor, and
death derive from human sin.
They
celebrated God the Father and the Mother. Women were considered equal and
participated in their services and worship.
Christ’s resurrection was considered
symbolic, rather than literal.
In the town of Naj
‘Hammadi, December, 1945, an Arab peasant stumbled on 13 papyrus books bound in
leather. An excited Professor Gilles Quispel,
distinguished historian of religion at Utrecht in the Netherlands, flew to
Egypt in the spring of 1955. He deciphered
some codices from Nag Hammadi and was startled to read: “These are the secret words which the living
Jesus spoke, and which the twin, Judas Thomas, wrote down.” This was a newly found text of codices that
had finally made its way to the Coptic Museum in Cairo. Did Jesus have a twin
brother? Could this be an authentic record of Jesus’ sayings? “What Quispel held in his hand, the Gospel of
Thomas, was only one of the fifty-two texts discovered at Nag Hammadi…” (Pagels,
p. xiv) In the same volume, the Gospel
of Phillip stated,
… the companion of the [Savior is] Mary
Magdalene.
[But
Christ loved] her more than [all] the disciples,
and used to kiss her [often] on her
[mouth]. The rest
of [the disciples were offended] … They said
to him,
“Why do you love her more than all of
us? The Savior
answered and said to them, “Why do I not love
you
as (I love) her?” (Pagels, p. xv)
This is Pagels: “Other sayings in this collection criticize
common Christian beliefs, such as the virgin birth or the bodily resurrection,
as naïve misunderstandings. Bound together with these gospels is the Apocryphon, literally, ‘secret book’ of
John, which opens with an offer to reveal ‘the mysteries [and the] things
hidden in silence’ which Jesus taught to his disciple John.” (Pagels, xv, xvi)
Quispel and others first
published the Gospel of Thomas and they suggested the date of c A.D. 140. Some thought
that since these gospels were considered heretical that they must have been
written later than the gospels of the New Testament, which were dated c.
60-110. Professor Helmut Koester of
Harvard University, “has suggested that the collection of writings in the Gospel of Thomas, although compiled c.
140, may include some traditions even older than the gospels of the New Testament,
‘possibly as early as the second half of the first century’ (50-100)—as early
as, or earlier, than Mark, Mathew, Luke, and John.” (Pagels, xvi, xvii)
Some of the texts that
describe the origin of the human race, that is, the Garden of Eden story is
quite different from the Old Testament. The
story is told from the point of view of the serpent! “Here,” Pagels says, “the
serpent, long known to appear in gnostic
literature as the principle of divine wisdom, convinces Adam and Eve to partake
of knowledge while ‘the Lord’ threatens them with death, trying jealously to
prevent them from attaining knowledge, and expelling them from Paradise when
they achieve it.” Another text,
entitled, Thunder, Perfect Mind, provides this poem in a feminine voice of
divine power:
For I am the first and the last.
I am the honored one and scorned one.
I
am the whore and the holy one,
I am the wife and the virgin …
I am the barren one,
And many are her sons …
I am the silence that is incomprehensible …
I am the utterance of my name.
(Pagels,
p. xvii)
Pagels asks the obvious
questions, “ … why were these texts buried and why have they remained virtually
unknown for nearly 2,000 years? She
answers with: “The Nag Hammadi texts,
and others like them, which circulated
at the beginning of the Christian era, were denounced as heresy by
orthodox Christians in the middle of the second century. We have long known that many early followers
of Christ were condemned by other Christians as heretics.” ( Pagels,
xviii)
Bishop Irenaeus who
supervised the church in Lyons, c. 180 wrote five volumes of condemnation that
began a campaign against heresy, the action in itself an admission of the
Gnostic Gospels persuasive power, says Pagels, yet the bishops prevailed. Emperor Constantine’s conversion and the
official recognition of Christianity as an approved religion in the fourth century
saw Christian bishops in power who were formerly victimized by police. Copies of banned books were burned and
destroyed. Possibly a monk from a nearby
monastery hid the Nag Hammadi books in jars where they remained almost 1,600
years. (Pagels, p. xix)
Why are all of these
stories important to the history of Unitarian Universalism ? Two
things: The unorthodox and unincluded texts from the Dead Sea scrolls and the Nag
Hammadi books carry again and again signs of liberal religion thinking. Second: UUs tend to lean toward metaphor opposed to
the literal translation of words said to be church law. In religious discussions this was important
historically and seems to be just as important today. In some cases, people’s
lives depend on their ideas and beliefs, then and now.
Pagels tells us that the
writings are unmistakably related to Jewish heritage and many tell secrets
about Jesus. These Christians are called
gnostics from the Greek work gnosis. “For those who claim to know nothing about
ultimate reality are called agnostic (literally, “not-knowing.”) And the person
who does claim to know such things is called gnostic,” or ‘knowing.’ “The Greek
language distinguishes between scientific or reflective knowledge ,” such as
‘he knows me,’ she knows math.’ The gnostics use the term to indicate insight because
gnosis includes an intuitive process of knowing oneself. “And to know oneself,
they claimed, is to know human nature and human destiny … To know oneself at
the deepest level means to know god, this is the secret of gnosis.” (Pagels, p.
xix)
A gnostic teacher,
Monoimus said:
Abandon the search for God and the creation
and other
matters of a similar sort. Look for him by taking yourself
as the starting point. Learn who it is within you who
makes everything his own and says, ‘My God,
my mind,
my thoughts, my soul, my body.’ Learn the
sources
of joy, love, hate … If you carefully
investigate these
matters you will find him in yourself. (Pagels, p. xx)
This and other passages
struck me as similar statements UUs make when we speak about who we are: Everyone must find her own path. Everyone is free to seek what is inside of
him, to use what experiences she brings to a sacred space to find the Beloved. In other words, liberal religion.
Pagels reasons that what
was found at Nag Hammadi shows striking differences between the New Testament
and the references the gnostic texts made to it, and to the Old Testament
scriptures, and the letters of Paul.
Briefly the differences are, 1, Orthodox Jews and Christians insist a
chasm exists between humanity and the creator. The gnostics contradict this
idea with this: self knowledge is
knowledge of God and the self and divine are identical. 2, The ‘living Jesus’ of the gnostic texts
speaks of illusion and enlightenment versus sin and repentence. Instead of a
saving us from our sin, Jesus comes as a guide and spiritual master. 3.
Orthodox Christians believe Jesus, Son of God, is forever distinct from
the humanity he came to save. The
gnostic Gospel of Thomas says that Jesus sees and recognizes Thomas, and says
to him that they both came from the same source: “Jesus said, ‘I am not your master. Because you have drunk, you have become drunk
from the bubbling stream which I have measured out’ …” (Pagels, p. xx).
The Gnostics stayed close
to the Greek tradition, and for that matter to Buddhist and Hindu traditions. The British scholar of Buddhism, Edward
Conze, points out that Thomas Christians (those who knew the Gospel of Thomas)
were in contact with Buddhists in South India and knew that influence. Gnosticism flourished from A.D. 80 through
200 as trade routes between the Greco-Roman world and the Far East opened up.
(Pagels, xxi) Unitarian Universalists draw on East and West religious thought as they do among
other world religions as sources.
Gnostic ideas, writings, and
practices were too “creative,” “inventive” to withstand the Nicene Council and
the organization and authority of orthodox Christianity. Elaine Pagels says that the fifty-two
writings discovered at Nag Hammadi gives only a glimpse of the complexity of
the early Christian movement.” (xxxv) She concludes that
… the Nag Hammadi discoveries give us a new
perspective …
we can understand why certain creative
persons throughout the ages,
from Valentinus and Heracleon to Blake,
Rembrandt, Dostoevsky,
Tolstoy, and Nietzsche, found themselves at
the edges of ortho-
doxy.
All were fascinated by the figure of Christ—his birth, life,
teachings, death, and resurrection: all returned constantly to
Christian symbols to express their own
experience. And yet
they found themselves in revolt against
orthodox institutions.
(Pagels,
p. 150)
This paper serves only as
a brief examination of the diverse early Christian movements and signs of liberal,
religious thought, which were the reasons many early Christian groups were
condemned as heretics. Part II will
begin with the Nicene Council and cover one particular figure, Michael
Servetus, who lived in the Middle Ages.
Tuesday, May 12, 2015
Poems, Art, and Activism: Which is Which?
This sermon was given on 3 May, 2015, by Shirley Rickett.
Sometime
early in March, 2003 at the time our country invaded the sovereign country of
Iraq with George Bush’s Shock and Awe campaign, Laura Bush invited Sam Hamill
to a White House symposium on poetry.
Hamill, author of thirteen volumes of poems, recipient of several
awards, and editor of Copper Canyon Press, asked his poet-friends to send him
poems that speak the conscience of the
country. He received 11,000 poems.
Hamill learned, after sending off his request for poems,
that Mrs. Bush had planned the symposium around the poetry of Walt Whitman,
Langston Hughes, and Emily Dickinson, according to Hamill, “three of the most
original and anti-establishmentarian poets in our literature.” (Introduction to
Poets Against the War, New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press/Nation Books, 2003, p.
xvii.) “Once the White House got wind of
our plans, ‘the symposium,’ Hamill continues, “was promptly ‘postponed.’” Mrs. Bush’s
spokesperson relayed this message:
“While Mrs. Bush respects the right of all Americans to express their
opinions, she, too, has opinions and believes it would be inappropriate to turn
a literary event into a political forum.” Hamill retorts, “So much for “Poetry
and the American Voice” at this White House. I hadn’t even had time to decline the
invitation.” (ibid)
When I purchased Hamill’s anthology, Poets Against the War, and read the words above in the
Introduction, I could only think yes and yes and this is great. Laura Bush just doesn’t get it that poems can
be a powerful voice against war and suffering.
And here was my license to write so-called political poems. I had been wondering how to do it. Just how does a poet write about a decision
her elected officials made to deliberately attack another country in a sort of pre-emptive
war? I didn’t get to vote on that. Everything about Shock and Awe went against
my beliefs, most of my deepest held convictions, as a UU. I can’t blame Laura. What else could she do aware as she was of her
husband’s policies as he was poised to invade a country? I was still disappointed. She was a librarian, a reader, and a woman
who wanted to have a symposium on three American poets.
I discussed the issue with my mentor and professor at
UMKC (University of Missouri at Kansas City).
She did not believe there was a genre called ‘political poems.’ She had a definite idea about the difference
between protest and Art with a capital “A.”
She pointed me to another poem as I held the Poets Against the War book in my hot, trembling hands.
It
was a poem about two women dressed in black walking quickly together, talking
in brief words, looking to bury a body. The
first thing that came to my mind was Antigone trying to bury the body of her
slain brother, which was against Greek law.
She would sneak out at night and throw dirt on the corpse. I understood that these two women in black
could have been from anywhere trying to bury the dead. It was a poem that spoke about war, any war
and the dead. Was this restraint enough? Was this enough to let out my anger for the wholesale
bombing of innocent people, children, babies, families, whole towns and
villages, and the destruction of museum art in the valley called the cradle of
civilization? ‘So, a couple of vases got
broken’ said William Rumsfield. No images
of the dead coming back home allowed on tv.
No images of thousands of civilians in hospitals, or body parts
scattered in the market place. It was a sanitized war for American consumption. Was poetry a vehicle for my protest, the
voice of conscience?
There
were several big name poets in the book.
Some of their poems seemed to hit the mark and some were almost too
oblique. I had noticed, also, some rather
bad poems, too. Michelle didn’t make speeches about art, but rather let me
figure it out for myself. It’s taken a
long time. Years. What I haven’t uncovered still nags at
me. So I tried to write, and in the
process I wrote some poems just after 911as an exercise with no intention of
sending them out. Here’s one:
09
11 01
A
few miles from Manhattan
a
photographer watched,
said
it looked like a huge
orange
and black flower.
The
genre action film, reality
now,
repeated itself as children
watched
tv and saw skyscrapers
in
city after city explode again
and
again as planes flew into them.
Now
the wheels of justice
creak
into place. Fields of poppies
bow
in foothills, on the plains.
An
abandoned truck sleeps in the sand.
In the dialogue after 911, parents said children saw the unending
sight on television of planes crashing into the Twin Towers and the collapse of
the buildings and thought all cities everywhere were destroyed. At the time, on the day itself, it was
thought the pilots had come from Iran or Iraq, or Afghanistan where soldiers
later hunted for Bin Laden, an Arab. Afghanistan
would be our next war. This poem was
written one month after September 11th.
10 11 01
Forty-thousand
widows
begged
on the streets of Kabul
before
airstrikes began.
Food
packets flutter to the ground
before missiles and bombs
whistle.
Do
you trust the food
from
those who deliver death?
Can
the packages become
the
fishes and loaves?
If
it's made in America,
(or
Taiwan or China)
it
must be so.
Widows and their children
were starving, Widows had no way to get
food. Yellow packets of food were
dropped, a couple of days supplies. Sarcasm.
Irony. Which
is OK. Irony can be useful. But what did these poems mean? Was it art?
Did they make a difference? Or was I merely recording history for
myself? The real question emerging
seemed to be, when is a poem a rant and when is it an effort aspiring to be art?
A
newer poem came out of a promise made at a meeting I attended for people
protesting the war in Iraq. The title
is:
Eric M. Steffeney, Waterloo, Iowa,
02-23-05
I’ve lost you so many
times,
the you I’ve tried to
imagine
from the black badge,
white words.
I wore the badge of
your death
on my green raincoat
for years.
No one ever asked
about it.
The promise I made,
to wear it
until the war, an
undeclared
war ended, faded in
détritus
of desk drawers, and
many ends
to the Iraq war, each
new promise
obscure as a lost
badge,
prolonged like
endless winter
with no spring to
believe in.
Today I found the
badge again,
the promise alive,
the haunt
of your death, the
fact of your life.
The war is not really
over, Eric.
There’s always
another one, fanned,
ready. Again the promise is honored.
This poem’s for you,
small act in the face
of constant war
played above an altar
of badges. Yet they stand for something,
these black
buttons: a prayer, a blessing,
your voice in Iowa
trees, your boyhood
under the sun, your
memory in my pen,
your name on my
breast again.
Was
I was getting close to what war meant to those who fought, and their families? Instead of concentrating on sheer protest
against government powers and their inane pronouncements and the corporate media,
I was focusing on metaphor, real lives, on people affected by this war, or now
in my mind, any war. The big picture,
the Long Now, humanity: how do we behave, live, mean? War is nothing new.
Suffering is nothing new. How does one
make art out of all this? Here’s a brief
excerpt from a poem in Poets Against the
War, by Katha Pollitt from her poem, “Trying to Write a Poem Against the
War,” (p. 183).
what good are poems against the war
the real subject of which
so often seems to be the poet’s superior
moral sensitivities? I could
be mailing myself to the moon
or marrying a palm tree,
and yet what can we do
but offer what we have?
Yes. There is that pesky ego I live with. “If you write a poem, put it in a jar. Then go outside to see if the trees are still
standing.” I can’t remember who said
that but I revisit it from time to time. And Michelle, my mentor would say that every
time you write a poem, you go up against the greatest poets who ever
lived. Harold Bloom wrote a book on that
subject called The Anxiety of Influence. That’s enough to make you
want to lay down that pen forever. And
it is that way some times. But I have to
write. It is a haven, my meditation, my prayer,
my path.
Whole books have been written on the definition of art,
but my favorite is one from Thomas Merton:
“Art enables us to find ourselves and lose ourselves at the same time.”
So that might be one of my yardsticks.
Many poets and artists have been activists. Their work reflects their deepest feelings that
match the essence of the seven principles:
the inherent worth and dignity of every person, justice, equity,
compassion in human relations, acceptance of others, the right of conscience, the
use of the democratic process, and respect for the web of life we share. Is that political or ethical, philosophical,
spiritual? Maybe it’s all of that. I find it hard sometimes to draw the line,
but those are some core values I trust.
I don’t always live up to them, but in my deepest heart, I know they
guide me.
A brilliant artist, Diego Revera, was commissioned by the
Rockefeller family to do a mural for the RCA building in New York in the 1930s. There was a portrait of Lenin in the unfinished
mural and he was asked to take it out of the painting. He refused and it was
covered for everyone to see in that busy place.
In the end, Revera destroyed it, which sent the press and critics into
an uproar at his protest. (Wikipedia)
The
play, The Cradle Will Rock, was
sponsored by the Federal Theater Project, an arm of WPA, which provided work for
actors during The Great Depression. Orson
Welles directed the play, and in 1999 Tim Robbins brought it to the movie
screen. Stories of the times of the
Great Depression were interwoven in the film “which commented on the role of art
and power, and the corresponding appeal of socialism and communism among many
intellectuals and working-class people of that time.”
Well known poet Archibald McLeish’s long poem, “ActFive”
brought silence. There were no
reviews. One critic said it was too
close to poetry propaganda and radio drama.
McLeish replied: “Take away a
poet’s public life by critical edict in a time like ours and what do you leave
him? Not, certainly, himself.” (“Archibald McLeish in an Interview,”
Benjamin DeMott, in The Paris Review) I listen
to both critics and poets and I read poems to learn.
Other
activist poets include Maya Angelou, Allen Ginsberg, Amiri Baraka, Alicia
Ostriker, Mamoud Darwish, and Adrienne Rich to name only a few. The latter,
famously declined the National Medal of Arts in protest for then House Speaker
Newt Gingrich, who voted to end funding for the National Endowment for the Arts. Rich has been called one of the most
influential voices in the 20th century for human rights. She makes no apologies for her poems. In an oft quoted essay, Rich mentions Shelly
and a phrase from “Queen Mab,” “Man’s evil nature’” that puts the reason for
evil and cruelty on humans. She makes of
this: “Shelly, in fact, saw powerful
institutions, not original sin or ‘human nature’ as the source of human
misery.” (Poetry and Commitment, Adrienne Rich, New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2007) But powerful institutions are run by
people.
Robert
Bly won the 1967 National Book Award for his book, The Light Around the Body.
In his acceptance speech he encouraged people and organizations to
protest the Vietnam War, and he explained that he would give his thousand
dollar check to the peace movement, and specifically those organizations that
worked on draft resistance. His poem
“The Teeth Mother Naked at Last,” in Sleepers
Holding Hands, (1973) “was a scathing invective against the War.” Bly had found a way to write through the eyes
of mythology, through the lens of the psyche to the dark side of human beings. He conjures up the Great Mother in the middle
of the book in prose.
The
Swiss scholar Bachofen suggested for the first time
in his book, Mother Right, published in 1861, the idea,
embarrassing
to the Swiss, that in every past society known
a
matriarchy has preceded the present patriarchy. His evidence
drawn
from Mediterranean sources, was massive. (Sleepers)
Bly isn’t saying anything
about the committed poet, but in other poems, he certainly touches on “powerful
institutions” and how they carry blame for Viet Nam. The difference between Rich’s approach and
Bly’s rests not in Shelley’s: “Kings, priests and statesmen blast the human
flower,” for rulers, the clergy and politicians are human, too. Bly does not put blame on human nature. (What
does that mean? It sounds like a vague
excuse for human beings when they make mistakes we can all accept, like ‘boys
will be boys.’) Bly makes the point
about our complex humanness, how we are wired, and the choices we make. And he does it with the teeth mother, a figure
derived from the human unconscious, a figure, said by Carl Jung, to be within
us all in some form or other.
Someone
once said we are all capable of murder.
Capable. Psychologist/philosopher
Carl Jung explains that idea with the Shadow, belonging to each of us. He says we must come to know our darker
selves. “ The problem of evil is the problem of the human ego … says James Hollis. And he calls the lowest common denominator, “
institutional Shadows.” (Why Good People
Do Bad Things, James Hollis, Gotham Books, New York: 2007.)
There is a personal Shadow and a collective Shadow. We often become our own worst enemy, whether
through acting on raw emotions or compromising our convictions through quiet
complicity. We might recall Robert McNamera, Nixon’s Secretary of State, who
made a documentary a few years ago, recanting his aggressive stance in the
cold, calculated deaths of so many in the Viet Nam War. Another example: the SS
Guards who went out each morning to supervise the starvation, torture, and murder
of Jews, and went home each evening to dinner with family, classical music, and
play with children. Perhaps a result of the schizophrenic nature the Shadow can
produce. Some human beings know of the
teeth mother and other archetypes and reject them, rationalize their behavior,
or do not recognize it.
W.H. Auden had his troubles, too. He did reach a conclusion about activism and art. He famously said this: “ Poetry makes nothing
happen.” He’s right. A poem never
stopped a war, nor changed legislation.
Yet where do we turn when we share unimaginable grief or joy? To poems, poetry, art. Who can ever forget Teddy Kennedy reading
from Romeo and Juliet as he eulogized his assassinated brother? “And when he shall die, / Take him and cut
him out in little stars / And he will make the face of heaven so fine / That
all the world will be in love with night / And pay no worship to the garish
sun.” (The Complete Signet Classic Shakespeare, gen. ed., Sylvan Barnet,
New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,
Inc., 1972)
Poetry
may not make anything happen, but it can be transformative. In her essay, Rich quotes a headline in the San Francisco Chronicle (July 17, 2005):
“Writing Poetry Was the Balm That Kept
Guantanamo Prisoners from Going Mad.”
Rich tells of a commander in the Israeli Defense Force who came upon
lines from poet, Yitzhak Laor. The commander’s words:
Reading
these lines a moment after a violent month
of reserve duty, which was full of a
sense of righteousness
…….was no easy thing. I remember that for one alarming
moment I felt that I was looking at
something that I was
forbidden to see. What this thing was, I did not know …
……….Laor’s strong words return to
echo in my ears:
‘With such obedience?
With such obedience? With
such obedience?
He was looking at
something he was ‘forbidden’ to see.
Forbidden. Ever since that
experience with a poet’s words, the commander refused to serve in the
territories and “Ometz Lesarev (Courage to Refuse) was born.” (Rich) The Commander turned pacifist. Prisoners kept their sanity. Poetry can be transformative.
Are
activist poets like Don Quixote, battling windmills? Maybe, sometimes. But they follow their convictions and go to
jail if need be. Their work is another
issue. I’ve read much work by activist
poets. I think, rather, they reach for
the unreachable star, as, I think all poets do.
I
conclude that it’s a matter of balance. UUs
welcome uncertainty and doubt, I think because we know, in the end, those two
states of mind will lead us to transformation.
I’ll
close with one short poem from my latest book, Transplant, titled, “Evening
News.” There are no divisions in my book, but there is a small section of war
related poems that I hope meet a standard that at least strives to be what we
call art. This poem came about after
watching evening after evening and Sundays were the worst, of pictures and
names of dead soldiers, sailors, marines, which were long lists in the years of
the Iraq War.
Evening News
At
the end of the news
come
the pictures
and
bios too short
to
mention a life
or
even to say
he
was here, she was here.
Proud
or funny faces,
often
a uniform,
sometimes
not,
when grieving
hands
can’t find that
photo.
If
you squint
you
might see them
playing
with a dog,
holding
a baby,
perhaps
at a graduation
a
camera in hand,
or
at a reunion
the
glass of wine
a
few inches from the lips.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)